While all three produce bokeh balls with a cat’s eye shape at their fastest apertures, the 56mm’s are much larger due to its very fast f/1.2 aperture. At f/2.8, on the other hand, those of the 56mm (and to some extent the 60mm) assume the shape of the aperture whereas the 50mm’s remain very round. 50mm at f/2. 56mm at f/1.2.
Pricewise the XF 23mm f/1.4 R LM WR is a far reach in comparison and perhaps it would be more fair to compare it to the more moderately priced XF 23mm f/2 R WR, $449.00. View fullsize The Viltrox AF 23mm F1.4 XF for Fujifilm X mount shown on the Fujifilm X-Pro3
A review of the TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 for Fujifilm X mount. Sample images, handling, specs, and image quality. TTArtisan 50mm f/0.95 vs. Fujifilmlm XF 50mm f/2 R WR.
From left to right, the new XC 35mm F2 (£169), the XF 35mm F2 R WR (£335) and the XF 35mm F1.4 R (£499) The XF35mm F2 R WR has been a hugely important lens for Fujifilm. Being a stop slower than the XF35mm F1.4 R means it doesn’t create quite the same magical blurred backgrounds wide-open, nevertheless it makes up for this by being smaller
Fujinon XF 56mm f1.2 R: Stunning portrait lens with beautiful bokeh, albeit slow to focus and heavy. Best for: Hardcore bokeh-lovers. $$$ Fujinon XF 50mm f2 R WR: Great portrait lens with quick focus, lighter weight, and weather resistant. Best for: Bokeh-lovers on a budget. $$ Fujinon XF 50-120 f2.8 R WR LM OIS
2. sshapiro wrote: I recently got the XF 50mm F2 lens and am wondering about an alternate lens hood. The one provided by Fujifilm is okay, but it does add quite a bit of length to the lens and I noticed there is a small amount of play if I wiggle it up and down. I did find the following option, from JJC, on Amazon.
22k7fB. l9grffsry0.pages.dev/32l9grffsry0.pages.dev/299l9grffsry0.pages.dev/374l9grffsry0.pages.dev/54l9grffsry0.pages.dev/304l9grffsry0.pages.dev/111l9grffsry0.pages.dev/339l9grffsry0.pages.dev/155l9grffsry0.pages.dev/27
fuji xf 50mm f 2 r wr review
